Holden needs to get facts straight
By Marc Stier -- Patriot-News Op-Ed
December 31, 2009, 1:26AM
(CHRIS
A. COUROGEN, Of The Patriot-News) Supporters
of the health care reform bill protest outside Rep..Tim Holden's Harrisburg
office on North Front Street recently. The demonstrators took Holden to task
for voting against the bill, which incudes the so-called "public
option."
It’s sad but not unusual to find big insurance
companies misleading people in their fight against health care reform.
But it’s distressing to see a member of Congress,
Tim Holden (D-Schuylkill), repeating these same misleading claims to justify
his vote against legislation that would benefit so many people in his
district.
Congressman Holden said he voted against the health
care reform bill because it included cuts to Medicare and Medicaid benefits.
This is what the big insurance want people to believe. It is what their
misleading TV ads directed toward seniors say. It is simply not true.
On Medicaid, there is nothing subtle about this. HR
3962 expands Medicaid benefits to people with incomes up to 150 percent of the
federal poverty line. It initially covers 100 percent of the cost with the
states picking up some of the cost later. It also provides fiscal relief to
states for Medicaid for one more year.
The legislation does require savings to be made in
the Medicare program. But those savings do not require cuts in benefits.
Indeed, the legislation improves Medicare benefits. It eliminates all co-pays
for preventive care. And it begins to close the Medicare Part D doughnut hole
that burdens seniors with substantial costs for pharmaceuticals. More than
12,300 seniors in the 17th Congressional District will benefit from this
provision. So where do the savings come from?
Partly they come from eliminating Medicare Advantage
programs that substitute private insurance for traditional Medicare. These
programs cost the federal government 15 percent more while not providing
better health care coverage. They are, however, a major source of profits for
the health insurance companies. Additional reductions in Medicare spending
come from providing better care. How does providing better care reduce costs?
Here are examples:
If seniors get better preventive and chronic care
they will be healthier as small problems are controlled before they become
large expensive problems. A diabetic whose illness is managed well will be
healthier and cost Medicare less than an out-of-control diabetic who
eventually needs dialysis or a kidney transplant.
If we eliminate most hospital-acquired infections
— as has been done in some hospitals in the state — seniors will be
healthier and suffer and die prematurely far less often and enormous amounts
of money can be saved.
If we reduce hospital readmissions by giving seniors
better after care when they leave the hospital, they will be healthier and
Medicare spending can be dramatically reduced. It is these kinds of cost
savings in Medicare — not cuts in benefits — that are central to HR 3962.
That is why AARP favors HR 3692. It knows that we can save money in Medicare
while also improving care for seniors.
Those savings in Medicare will help pay for the
enormous benefits HR 3962 brings people in the 17th Congressional District.
Under the bill, more than 25,000 uninsured individuals will get access to
quality, affordable health insurance. Another 168,000 households will receive
tax credits that make their health insurance affordable. More than 15,000
small businesses that are now priced out of the market will be able to obtain
health insurance they can afford and tax credits will reduce the costs of
insurance further for 13,000 businesses. And up to 900 families a year will
avoid bankruptcy due to health care costs.
Our campaign for health care reform has been saying
that members of Congress have to make a choice, between benefiting the people
of this country and benefiting the insurance companies.
Holden made his choice. And to justify it, he has
been repeating the false statements of insurance companies about Medicare and
Medicaid. A conference committee bill is likely to come back to the House,
probably in January. Let’s hope that this time Holden sides with the people
of the 17th District and not the insurance companies.
Marc Stier is state director for Health Care for
America Now
http://healthcareforamericanow.org/
© 2009 PennLive.com. All
rights reserved.